Figure 6 11 in Java Generating Code 39 in Java Figure 6 11

Figure 6 11 use java code-39 generating todraw code39 on java Android Figure 6 12 Figure 6 13 Code 39 Full ASCII for Java Figure 6 14 Figure 6 15 Figure 6 16 Figure 6 17 Figure 6 18 Figure 6 19 Figure 6 20 Figure 6 21 Figure 6 22. Figure 6 23 Figure 6 24 Appendix B List of Figures Figure 6 25 Figure 6 26 applet Code 39 Figure 6 27 Figure 6 28 Figure 6 29 Figure 6 30 Figure 6 31 Figure 6 32 Figure 6 33 Figure 6 34 Figure 6 35 Figure 6 36 Figure 6 37 Figure 6 38 Figure 6 39 Figure 6 40 Figure 6 41 Figure 6 42 Figure 6 43 Figure 6 44 To compute ProcIindex, each process component is decomposed into specific activities. Example activity value scales for the Seller Project Planning component of the organizational process. Example activity value scales for the Seller Development Team component of our organizational process.

Example activity value scales for the Customer/Seller Development Team and Seller Senior Management components of our organizational process. ProcIindex is defined and calculated in terms of process components, component activities, and activity value scales. This figure illustrates one way to display the results of quantifying a software development process.

On the basis of the example measures, the process integrity index, ProcIindex, equals 0.59. This high-level procedure helps you through the process measurement steps based on the concepts and examples introduced in this chapter.

The Software Engineering Institute s Capability Maturity Model for Software is a five-level road map for improving an organization s software systems development process. Each maturity level is a well-defined evolutionary plateau on the path toward becoming a mature software organization. Each maturity level consists of key process areas (KPAs).

Each KPA is characterized, in part, by goals and key practices. A repeatable software process that has integrity is one that has the following six process components shown above (xt1), (xt2), (xt3), (xt4), (xt5), and (xt6). The Requirements Management process component (i.

e., key process area) can be measured using the three activities labeled RM.AC.

1, RM.AC.2, and RM.

AC.3. Example activity value scales for the three activities making up the Requirements Management key process area.

The Level 2 process goodness scale ranges from a minimum value of 0.0 (i.e.

, activities not being performed in any KPA) to a maximum value of 1.0 (i.e.

, all activities being performed in each KPA). The process integrity index for CMM Level 2 can be defined using the activities for each of the six Key Process Areas. For example, there are three activities for Requirements Management (i.

e., xt1), fifteen activities for Software Project Planning (i.e.

, xt2), etc. Measurements can be used to help improve software systems development processes and the resultant products. The product integrity index or process integrity index can be implemented for organization and project perspectives.

What is the relationship between your product and process integrity indexes This figure suggests some possible interpretations. Applying metrics to the software systems development process should be part of the process itself. This high-level procedure is to help you through the product and process measurement steps based on the concepts and examples introduced in this chapter.

An annotated outline for getting you started in defining a product and process measurement approach for your organization. This ADPE element can also be used to refine a measurement approach you already (informally) have in place..

7 Cultural Change Figu re 7 1 Figure 7 2 Figure 7 3 Figure 7 4 Figure 7 5 Losses, doubts, and fears contribute to a person s unwillingness to make a transition (change) to a new way of doing things. Often people view transition as a painful experience. Changing a software systems development environment starts with establishing an understanding of the organization s overall existing culture.

This figure summarizes four types of organizational cultures. It is important for you to understand what your culture is and what you want your culture to be before you begin planning a transformation. The vision of the software systems development culture helps to set the organization s strategic focus for process improvement.

ADPE implementation strikes at the core of organizational and personal practice. Altering these practices is thus tantamount to effecting cultural change at the organizational and personal level. Here are key cultural change concepts explained in this chapter.

These key ideas are your guide to bringing about cultural change within your organization through ADPE implementation..
Copyright © . All rights reserved.